6.3.5 Ongoing Monitoring of the Business Relationship
يسري تنفيذه من تاريخ 13/7/2023(AML-CFT Decision Article 4.2(b), Article 4.3(c), 7.1)
With regard to established Business Relationships, FIs are obliged to undertake ongoing supervision of customers’ activity, including monitoring of transactions executed throughout the course of the relationship to ensure that they are consistent with the information, types of activity, and the risk profiles of the customers. FIs should use a risk-based approach to determine the policies, methods, procedures and controls they implement in relation to monitoring customers’ transactions and activities, as well as in regard to the extent of monitoring for specific customers or categories of customers.
As part of a risk-based approach to AML/CFT, in the case of customers or Business Relationships identified as high risk, FIs are expected to investigate and obtain more information about the purpose of transactions, and to enhance ongoing monitoring and review of transactions in order to identify potentially unusual or suspicious activities. In the case of customers or Business Relationships that are identified as low risk, FIs may consider monitoring and reviewing transactions at a reduced frequency.
Thus, in keeping with the level of risk involved, FIs should monitor and examine transactions in relation to the CDD information and risk profile of the customer (see Section 6.3, Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Measures, Section 6.4, Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) Measures, and Section 6.5, Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) Measures). Where necessary, FIs should also obtain sufficient information on the counterparties and/or other parties involved (including but not limited to information from public sources, such as internet searches), in order to determine whether the transactions appear to be:
| • | Normal (consideration should be given as to whether the transactions are typical for the customer, for the other parties involved, and for similar types of customers); |
| • | Reasonable (consideration should be given as to whether the transactions have a clear rationale and are compatible with the types of activities that the customer and the counterparties are usually engaged in); |
| • | Legitimate (consideration should be given as to whether the customer and the counterparties are permitted to engage in such transactions, such as when specific licenses, permits, or official authorisations are required). |
Examples of some of the methods that may be employed for the ongoing monitoring of transactions include, but are not limited to:
| • | Threshold-based rules, in which transactions above certain pre-determined values, numerical volumes, or aggregate amounts are examined; |
| • | Transaction-based rules, in which the transactions of a certain type are examined; |
| • | Location-based rules, in which the transactions involving a specific location (either as origin or destination) are examined; |
| • | Customer-based rules, in which the transactions of particular customers are examined. |
FIs may use all or any combination of the above methods, or any others that are appropriate to their particular circumstances, to effect ongoing monitoring of the Business Relationship. Furthermore, monitoring systems and methods may be automated, semi-automated, or manual, depending on the nature and size of their businesses. Whichever methods FIs elect to use, however, FIs should document them (see Section 9, Record Keeping), obtain senior management approval for them, and periodically review and update them to ensure their effectiveness. FIs should also establish specific monitoring procedures for customers and business relationships which have been reported as suspicious to the FIU (see Section 7.11, Handling of Transactions and Business Relationships after Filing of STRs).